Former DOJ Officials Break Silence on Kiernan Major Case

Through a swarm of vehicle and body doubles, elaborate disguises, sophisticated misdirection, and all-around flawless tradecraft, two senior U.S. Justice Department officials out of the Washington D.C. office met with our investigative team in a Los Angeles area home to blow the whistle on what they called "one of the most dishonest and disgraceful" cases they had ever reviewed. Our four-hour interview still feels as though it was much stranger than fiction—surrounded ostensibly by hundreds of security personnel who blocked all traffic to and from the property and implemented a stunning variety of physical and technical expertise to draw attention of potential emergency personnel and bystanders elsewhere, our team was in total awe of the immense and rather imposing capabilities of this security team. We often were unable to even focus on the interviews as we struggled to grasp whether this was reality or a possibly figment of our imagination. In spite of our childish fascination, our team was able to gather a fresh and highly credible perspective that raises grave concerns about the 2022 federal indictment of Kiernan Major and many of those allegedly involved in it.

In approximately 2020, Major's former private-intelligence firm EyesOnly Enterprises detected efforts by a perceived adversary to conduct surveillance on Major himself, so naturally, sources claim EyesOnly personnel then surveilled those observing Major as well as directed Major on methods to feed these adversaries favorable misinformation in an effort to "provide them enough rope to trip themselves," according to a former EyesOnly executive interviewed by our team in 2023. Something the same source claims has continued and has become so rampant with "lawlessness" and alleged state-collaboration that the culprits could be looking at both job termination and considerable prison time if Major's team ever decided to hand over their alleged findings to authorities. An endeavor Major isn't remotely inclined to carry out, according to a legal representative; however, they did hint that if this "madness" doesn't end "permanently," that it may find its way to a "deeply motivated prosecutor."

Nevertheless, one of the two formerly senior DOJ officials we interviewed had much harsher words for the apparent adversaries of Major. Drawing on the commonly-held opinion that a federal grand jury can "indict a ham sandwich," one former official explosively condemned both the indictment as well as the allegedly "manufactured" hysteria that followed it by asserting that the stories which were based on a criminal complaint which was rejected by a Los Angeles grand jury on all claims contained other than the allegations of threatening communications—allegations Major had already admitted to prior to even having been indicted. Yet, in spite of these facts, their entertainment-style reporting and misleading headlines reflect merely nothing other than the allegations which were rejected, hoping the everyday person will misinterpret it.

"It makes our blood boil," said one of the former DOJ officials, adding "[Major] is a f-----g combat veteran with severe [PTSD] and these b-----ds tortured him 24/7 until he would inevitably lose his temper, all so they could take those moments as far out of context as possible and attempt to label him as some kind of unstable or immoral person."

During this exchange, the officials' colleague stated that this is a widely shared opinion of many officials familiar with Major's case and that allegedly, if it weren't for Major himself personally preventing them from taking any action, that they'd "reside at a federal institution." All incredibly strong words, but a seemingly justified degree of anger by these professionals. Many DOJ and FBI officials are themselves former U.S. military veterans who very well may have lost their own friends to combat or even suicide, which makes this a far more personal matter to them that many may not initially have considered. One of Major's legal representatives claims he has shown

"a stunning level of restraint in the face of such a dishonest and ruthless opposition clearly willing to say or do anything to see him suffer."

Adding that Major even "demanded the firing" of any legal or investigative professional who even so much considered utilizing inconvenient or embarrassing information on his accusers or the prosecutors' team. They claim that he called them from a Los Angeles federal detention center stating he was "happy to do time if it meant [the alleged victims] would be able to find some kind of resolve" and to "leave [the alleged victims] the f--k out of this," suggesting that they were being unfairly used as pawns in a much larger game of chess, further asking them to spread the word that this behavior "will not be tolerated."

Just before our team was eventually searched, blindfolded again, and then escorted by the cavalry of heavily armed security personnel back to our hotels in Beverly Hills, one former DOJ official made it a point to say rhetorically "you guys realize the Justice Department does do press releases correct?" He continued saying "they couldn't in [Major's] case because it would have totally contradicted their pile of trash and jeopardized the whole case." The other former DOJ official later claimed in a much calmer tone, "I mean c'mon, [Major] had a federal sentencing guideline range of 10-16 months," adding that he was sentenced to "more than quadruple the lower end range of those guidelines," which the former official claims is "unbelievably, let's, let's, let's say odd." Well very odd indeed, especially for someone with no criminal history whatsoever and one who reportedly suffers from trauma and nerve related conditions, which themselves stem from serving the same government who put him in jail and participated in his character assassination. So the question remains, will the drama ever end? Well, various sources claim multiple "household names" do stand eager to publish, podcast and broadcast in addition to other U.S. government insiders who seemingly also stand ready to dish out swift punishment if the need arises, and DOJ whistleblowers tell us, if they must, they "would be honored to shake the ground beneath their feet and especially that of the corrupt officials assisting them." It seems we'll have to wait and see, but based on our observations, it wouldn't be wise to rattle the hornets' nests much more, but fools will be fools. Until then, our team will have to gleefully reminisce about the James Bond-style experience we had interviewing these officials and wonder just what type of nuclear-level fuel is backing Kiernan Major and his silent supporters.

Editorial Note: The following report is based on interviews with former Department of Justice officials who spoke on the strict condition of anonymity. The direct quotes and specific allegations contained herein are the assertions of these sources. While our team has verified the context of these meetings, the opinions expressed within the quotes are solely those of the speakers.