Latest Stories
Most recently published stories in Longevity.
In Breakthrough, Israeli Scientists Use Deep-Brain Stimulation to Counter Schizophrenia. AI-Generated.
Israeli researchers have announced a medical breakthrough that could transform the treatment of schizophrenia, using deep-brain stimulation (DBS) to significantly reduce severe symptoms in patients who had not responded to conventional therapies. The development marks one of the first successful demonstrations of DBS targeting brain circuits linked directly to psychosis rather than movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. The study, conducted by neuroscientists at Hebrew University of Jerusalem in collaboration with clinicians from Hadassah Medical Center, involved a small group of patients suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Researchers implanted ultra-thin electrodes into precise areas of the brain associated with hallucinations, disorganized thinking, and emotional regulation. Targeting the Roots of Psychosis Deep-brain stimulation works by delivering controlled electrical impulses to specific neural circuits, helping rebalance abnormal brain activity. While DBS has been widely used for years in neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy, its application in psychiatric illnesses has remained experimental. According to the research team, patients who received the stimulation showed a marked reduction in auditory hallucinations and paranoia within weeks of activation. Several participants also demonstrated improved cognitive focus and emotional stability, allowing them to resume daily activities that had previously been impossible. “This is the first time we’ve been able to directly modulate the brain networks that drive schizophrenic symptoms,” said the study’s lead neurologist. “Instead of suppressing symptoms chemically, we are correcting faulty electrical signaling at its source.” A New Option for Resistant Cases Schizophrenia affects nearly 24 million people worldwide, according to the World Health Organization, and is commonly treated with antipsychotic medications. While drugs are effective for many patients, about 30 percent suffer from treatment-resistant schizophrenia, experiencing persistent hallucinations and delusions despite multiple medication trials. For these patients, options are limited, often involving long-term hospitalization and heavy sedation. The Israeli team believes DBS could offer a new path for those who have exhausted existing therapies. One patient involved in the trial described the change as “life-altering.” “The voices that controlled my life became quieter,” he said through a hospital statement. “For the first time in years, I felt like myself again.” Safety and Ethical Questions Despite promising results, researchers stress that the technique remains experimental. Implanting electrodes in the brain carries surgical risks, and long-term effects are still unknown. Ethical questions also surround the use of neuromodulation to influence thought patterns and behavior. Medical ethicists have urged caution, emphasizing the need for strict consent protocols and transparent oversight. “This technology touches the very core of identity and autonomy,” said one independent psychiatrist not involved in the study. “We must ensure that patient rights remain central.” The research team has stated that all participants volunteered after extensive psychological evaluation and that stimulation levels were carefully adjusted to avoid personality changes or cognitive impairment. Global Implications If validated in larger clinical trials, the breakthrough could reshape psychiatric medicine worldwide. Experts believe DBS could eventually be customized for different mental disorders, including severe depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. International interest in the findings has been swift. Medical institutions in Europe and North America have requested access to the study’s methodology, and discussions are underway for a multinational clinical trial involving dozens of patients. The Israeli government has also expressed support for expanding neuroscience funding, calling the research a milestone for mental health innovation. Looking Ahead The next phase of the project will involve testing DBS on a larger group of patients over longer periods to assess durability, side effects, and overall quality-of-life improvements. Researchers are also exploring non-invasive stimulation techniques that could replicate some of the benefits without surgery. While DBS will not replace medication for most patients, scientists believe it could become a specialized therapy for the most severe and resistant forms of schizophrenia. “This is not a cure,” the lead researcher cautioned, “but it is the strongest evidence yet that schizophrenia can be treated at the level of brain circuitry rather than just symptoms.” For millions living with the disorder and their families, the breakthrough offers new hope that science is moving closer to understanding—and controlling—the biological roots of mental illness.
By Fiaz Ahmed 8 days ago in Longevity
INTERVIEW: China must surrender know‑how for EU access, says critical mineral CEO. AI-Generated.
Brussels – Europe’s vulnerability in the global critical minerals market is laid bare by the CEO of a major mining and processing firm, who tells Euractiv that China must surrender proprietary know‑how as a precondition for accessing the EU market. The stark prescription comes amid mounting tensions over rare earths and other essential inputs for clean technology, defence and advanced manufacturing — sectors where Europe remains heavily dependent on imports from Beijing. “China’s dominance is not just about raw materials — it’s about the technologies and processes that turn those resources into usable products,” the CEO said in an interview. “If Chinese companies want to sell into the EU, they should be required to share that know‑how with European partners as part of joint ventures. Otherwise we are simply feeding the machine that marginalises our industry.” His comments reflect deep frustration inside European industry and government that recent Chinese export controls on critical minerals and processing technologies have given Beijing a veto over European supply chains. In late 2025, Chinese authorities tightened licensing for exports of rare earth elements and other critical inputs, demanding detailed information about products, customers and production processes before approving foreign shipments. The effect has been to give Chinese regulators a strategic window into foreign industrial networks while prolonging Europe’s reliance on Beijing for essential inputs. BusinessMirror Why the concern? Critical minerals — such as lithium, cobalt, gallium, germanium, and rare earth elements (REEs) — are central to Europe’s climate, digital and defence strategies. They feed into electric vehicles, renewable energy infrastructure, semiconductors, and high‑precision military equipment. Yet China currently dominates processing and refining capacity for many of these materials, accounting for roughly 98% of rare earth processing and high shares of other strategic inputs. This imbalance has prompted Brussels to adopt a range of new policies, notably the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act, which aims to boost domestic extraction, processing and recycling, and reduce reliance on external suppliers by setting milestones for European production by 2030. Despite such measures, European industry insiders often describe the current situation as untenable. One senior executive told Euractiv that licensing requirements imposed by Beijing have forced German firms to divulge commercial data that could be exploited for leverage, effectively revealing vulnerabilities in Europe’s supply chains and defence industrial base. BusinessMirror “It’s one thing to sell raw materials — it’s another to expose your competitive strategies, your customer lists, your future plans,” the executive said. “We are being asked to trade strategic information for a licence. That’s not a market; it’s coercion.” A radical proposal In this context, the CEO argued for market access reciprocity — similar to policies once employed by Beijing itself — whereby foreign firms must enter joint ventures with local companies and share technology as a condition of access. “Europe should require this not just for equity, but for the exchange of technical expertise that raises our own capabilities,” he said. This approach echoes recommendations from European economic analysts who argue that Brussels has historically undervalued its leverage as one of China’s largest export markets. Such commentators contend that attached conditions — including joint ventures with technology transfer provisions — could help balance decades of asymmetrical integration. PubAffairs Bruxelles Critics of the proposal caution that forcing technology sharing may backfire if it drives Chinese investment away or triggers retaliation. “China is unlikely to agree to this voluntarily,” said one European diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity. “This would effectively mean we are shaping industrial policy on Beijing’s terms, rather than ours.” They argue that multilateral negotiation and diversified sourcing should remain the priority. EU policy responses In recent months, EU policymakers have accelerated efforts to build alternative supply chains. In addition to the Critical Raw Materials Act, Brussels has expanded partnerships with countries such as Canada, Australia and Ukraine to diversify sourcing, while also investing in domestic research and processing capacity. European Commission officials have signalled that a coordinated response to Chinese export curbs is being formulated, although details remain under negotiation. President Ursula von der Leyen has publicly called for “smoother, predictable supply chains” and emphasised the importance of reduced dependencies. Some analysts say the EU should contemplate deeper strategic tools — including using trade defence mechanisms or anti‑coercion instruments — if diplomatic engagement fails to yield results. Others warn that protectionist responses could escalate tensions and disrupt global markets. Industry concerns For European manufacturers, unstable access to critical minerals has tangible consequences. Delays in obtaining REEs or gallium, for example, can stall production of electric motors or semiconductor components, affecting competitiveness in future industries. It also complicates long‑term green and defence planning. “In Europe, we have the demand and the industrial capacities — but we lack secure, affordable access to the materials that enable innovation,” said the CEO. “China has used its dominance to its advantage for too long. We need a level playing field, not one tilted in Beijing’s favour.” As the EU grapples with how to balance engagement with strategic autonomy, the debate over reciprocity and technology sharing is likely to intensify — underscoring the complex geopolitics at the heart of critical mineral supply chains.
By Fiaz Ahmed 9 days ago in Longevity
She’s a Superstar Olympian — And She’s Done Staying Silent About Vitriol. AI-Generated.
At the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan‑Cortina, 22‑year‑old freestyle skiing star Eileen Gu — already among the most decorated athletes in her sport — has publicly pushed back against years of online hate, personal attacks and vitriol tied to her career choices and national representation. Gu — who was born and raised in the United States but has competed for China since 2019 — has amassed five Olympic medals, including golds and silvers, and is widely seen as one of the greatest female freestyle skiers of her generation. Yet amid her continued success, she has also faced an unrelenting storm of criticism — both for her athletic decisions and her public visibility. That backlash has now reached a breaking point. In recent days, Gu has spoken more openly than ever before about the hatred and threats she has endured, describing the toll of online vitriol and personal attacks that extended far beyond typical sports commentary. According to reports, she said that at just 22 she has “gone through some things … that I really think no one should ever have to endure,” including social media hostility and other forms of harassment. Dailymotion Her willingness to publicly address this toxicity marks a departure from the reticence that has characterized much of her career. For years, critics from across the political and media spectrum have targeted Gu for her choice to represent China rather than the United States in international competition — a decision she made in 2019 to honor her heritage and expand her influence in a growing winter sports culture in China. A Target of Harsh Criticism The backlash has not been limited to social media noise. According to reporting, Gu has described facing death threats and even being physically assaulted and robbed while on the Stanford University campus — incidents she has linked in part to the intense political and cultural debate surrounding her Olympic allegiance. Political figures and commentators have also weighed in, with some publicly characterizing her as unpatriotic or disloyal for choosing to ski for China — criticisms that have added further fuel to the digital vitriol directed at her. Despite this, Gu has refused to retreat from her platform. The Olympic standout has embraced her role as a global figure, using her visibility to encourage young people — especially girls — to pursue their athletic dreams and to find strength in adversity. Defending Her Achievements Gu’s boldness has been on full display at the Winter Games themselves. In a widely shared moment at a press event, she delivered a firm response when a reporter framed her 2026 silver medals as “gold medals lost.” Gu laughed off the suggestion, calling such a perspective “ridiculous” and emphasizing that each medal — regardless of color — represents years of dedication, growth and achievement. That moment resonated far beyond the skiing community, gaining viral attention and drawing praise for her grace and confidence under pressure. Context: Representation and Identity Gu’s journey has long sat at the intersection of sports, identity and geopolitics. Born in San Francisco to an American father and Chinese mother, she has navigated complex narratives around nationality and representation. Although China does not recognize dual citizenship, Gu has publicly stated that she feels both American and Chinese, and sees her role as a bridge between cultures. Her decision in 2019 to compete for China sparked debate years before the 2026 Olympics, and although she has cultivated support in both nations, she also became the target of intense scrutiny — with critics questioning her patriotism and motivations. Growing Through Struggle In recent interviews and public statements, Gu has reframed the challenges she’s faced as part of her personal development. “It doesn’t get easier — you just get stronger,” she said in reflecting on the accumulation of pressure, online hate and expectations. Dailymotion For Gu and many other modern athletes, the spotlight of the Olympics is no longer solely about athletic performance. It has become a platform where personal conviction, cultural identity and the pressures of digital age discourse collide — and where champions are increasingly asked not only to compete but to confront the storms that come with global fame. Through it all, Gu has made clear she will not remain silent.
By Fiaz Ahmed 9 days ago in Longevity
7 Common Mistakes in Sciatica Treatment That Slow Down Healing
1. Ignoring early symptoms One of the most common mistakes is waiting for the pain to go away on its own. In its early stages, sciatica may manifest as mild discomfort in the lower back or buttocks, which worsens when sitting or bending over. Many people ignore this and continue with their usual lifestyle.
By Amelia Grant9 days ago in Longevity
Nothing You Can Do’ — Older Patients ‘No Longer Feel Protected’. AI-Generated.
Across the United Kingdom, a growing number of older patients and care advocates are sounding the alarm over what they describe as a deterioration in the quality, safety, and dignity of healthcare services for Britain’s ageing population. From long waits for basic care to perceptions that the health system no longer safeguards their rights, many elderly patients say they feel increasingly vulnerable and overlooked. Patients Speak Out “For many of us, it feels like we are invisible,” said Margaret Davies, 78, who has lived with chronic respiratory illness for more than a decade. “You come into hospital needing help, and the message you get is: there’s nothing you can do. It’s humiliating — and frightening.” Davies’ experience is increasingly echoed by older patients across the country. Reports from patient advocacy groups and local health forums indicate that delays in treatment, understaffed wards, and a sense of frustration among frontline staff are affecting not only medical outcomes but the emotional wellbeing of seniors who rely on the National Health Service for care. “I ended up waiting eight hours for a bed last winter,” recalled 82-year-old George Patel. “No one told us why. There were people lying on stretchers in corridors. It’s like they treat us as if we don’t matter.” Rising Concerns Over Safety and Standards Healthcare professionals confirm that wards treating elderly patients are under severe pressure. Some say that deteriorating conditions are not simply about individual care but reflect systemic issues — including workforce shortages, bed shortages, and funding constraints. “Nurses and doctors are committed, but they are stretched beyond what is safe,” said one senior clinician, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “We are constantly firefighting. That impacts older patients most — they need time, patience, and careful attention.” Studies show that older adults are more likely to be admitted with complex needs, including multiple chronic conditions, mobility challenges, and cognitive issues such as dementia. This makes continuity of care essential, yet critics argue that fragmented services and staffing pressures are compromising care quality. An interim report by a patient safety advocacy group noted that “older patients are disproportionately affected by delays, inadequate discharge planning, and insufficient support in community settings.” It added: “Many elderly patients feel they are treated as a burden rather than as individuals with rights to respectful, safe care.” Discharge and Community Care Challenges Another flashpoint for older patients has been hospital discharge. Relatives and carers frequently describe situations where seniors are released with minimal planning, sometimes arriving home with no support in place. One caregiver, whose 85-year-old mother was recently discharged after a fall, said: “They just handed her a bag of medications and told us to manage. There was no follow-up, no care plan, nothing. It’s like an assembly line.” Local community care services, already under strain, struggle to fill the gap. Councils warn that rising demand and tight budgets are making it harder to provide timely home support — and elderly patients are bearing the brunt. Government and NHS Response Officials from the Department of Health and Social Care acknowledge the concerns but argue that reforms are underway. A spokesperson said: “We recognise the pressures on health and social care services, particularly for older people. Efforts are ongoing to increase funding, recruit more healthcare staff, and improve integrated care between hospitals and community services.” The spokesperson emphasized initiatives to expand geriatric care training and improve patient flow out of hospitals. “Older patients deserve safe, dignified care. We are committed to delivering that,” they said. However, campaigners argue that limited progress and slow implementation mean change has yet to be felt on the ground. They are calling for more robust staffing targets, better oversight of care standards, and long-term investment in community support — so that elderly patients are not left waiting or pushed through the system without individualised attention. Broader Social Implications Advocates say the issue goes beyond healthcare; it touches on how society values its ageing population. “This isn’t just a health policy problem — it’s a moral one,” said a spokesperson for a UK ageing advocacy network. “Older adults are our parents, grandparents, neighbours. When they tell us they no longer feel protected, that should shake us all.” The organization has launched a campaign to collect testimonies from older patients and their families, aiming to push policymakers for action ahead of upcoming health spending decisions. Conclusion As the UK grapples with rising demand on its health and social care system, the voices of older patients — once quiet, now urgent — reflect deep unease. With pressures mounting on hospitals, community care, and staffing, many feel that the safety net they once relied upon has frayed. Whether through policy change, funding reform, or cultural shifts in how elderly care is prioritised, advocates and patients alike say that meaningful action cannot wait.
By Fiaz Ahmed 9 days ago in Longevity
Children Injured by NHS Can Claim Damages for Lifetime Lost Earnings, Court Rules. AI-Generated.
A landmark court ruling in the United Kingdom has established that children who suffer injuries due to NHS negligence may claim damages to cover lifetime lost earnings, setting a significant precedent in medical negligence law. The decision, delivered by the High Court, underscores the responsibility of healthcare providers to compensate young patients for long-term economic impacts resulting from treatment errors or lapses in care. The Case at Hand The ruling emerged from a case involving a child who sustained a serious injury at birth due to a mismanaged medical procedure in an NHS hospital. The injury has left the individual with lifelong disabilities, significantly limiting their employment prospects. The child’s legal representatives argued that damages should account not only for immediate medical expenses but also for future loss of earnings, educational opportunities, and career potential. In a detailed judgment, the court agreed, emphasizing that the economic consequences of such injuries can extend over decades and should be factored into compensation awards. “Children injured by healthcare negligence should receive full reparation for the lifelong disadvantages they face,” the judgment stated. Legal Implications Legal experts describe the ruling as a major development in personal injury and medical negligence law. Traditionally, damages for children were calculated using standard formulas with assumptions about future earning capacity, often constrained by age at the time of settlement. The new precedent ensures that courts take a more comprehensive approach, incorporating realistic projections of lifetime earnings, potential career paths, and inflation-adjusted compensation. “This decision recognizes the long-term impact of medical errors on a child’s future,” said Harriet Collins, a solicitor specializing in personal injury law. “It aligns compensation more closely with the principle of full restitution, acknowledging that a lifelong disability affects every aspect of a person’s economic and social life.” NHS and Policy Response The NHS expressed concern over the potential financial implications of the ruling but emphasized that patient safety and accountability remain paramount. A spokesperson stated, “We are reviewing the court’s decision carefully. While this may affect how claims are calculated in future, our priority remains providing high-quality care and learning from any incidents to prevent harm.” The Department of Health and Social Care is reportedly assessing guidance for NHS trusts on risk management and claims handling in light of the decision, aiming to balance fiscal responsibility with patient rights. Impact on Future Claims The ruling is expected to influence ongoing and future litigation involving childhood injuries. Lawyers anticipate an increase in claims seeking comprehensive compensation for lost earnings, particularly in cases involving permanent disabilities or conditions that significantly limit employment opportunities. Medical negligence organizations note that while the ruling increases potential compensation awards, it also encourages proactive safety measures and improved patient care standards. “The message is clear: healthcare providers must prioritize prevention of avoidable harm,” said Professor David Moore, an expert in medical law. Broader Societal Implications Beyond legal and financial considerations, the ruling has wider social significance. It highlights the economic and personal challenges faced by children with lifelong injuries and reinforces the societal responsibility to ensure justice for vulnerable patients. Advocates argue that adequate compensation can help families cover additional support costs, specialized education, and care needs, contributing to better quality of life for affected individuals. Conclusion The High Court’s decision affirms that children harmed by NHS negligence are entitled to compensation that accounts for lifetime lost earnings, marking a transformative moment in medical law. By recognizing the long-term economic impact of healthcare injuries, the ruling sets a precedent that will shape legal practice, NHS policy, and the rights of patients for years to come. As the healthcare system continues to grapple with resource constraints and litigation risks, the judgment serves as a reminder of the enduring responsibility of medical institutions to safeguard the well-being and futures of their youngest patients.
By Fiaz Ahmed 9 days ago in Longevity
What Hospice Nurses Notice About the People Who Lived Longest
They're present at the end of hundreds - sometimes thousands - of lives. They watch people in their final weeks and months. They see who fades quickly and who hangs on far longer than anyone expected.
By Destiny S. Harris9 days ago in Longevity
